|
|
|
![]() WORLD SERVICE BOARD OF TRUSTEES BULLETIN #29 Regarding
Methadone and Other
This bulletin was written by the World Service Board of Trustees in 1996. It represents the views of the board at the time of writing. Not all of us come to our first NA meeting drug free. Some of us were uncertain about whether recovery was possible for us and initially came to meetings while still using. Others came to their first meetings on drug replacement programs such as methadone and found it frightening to consider becoming abstinent. One of the first things we heard was that NA is a program of complete abstinence and "The only requirement for membership is the desire to stop using." Some of us, upon hearing these statements, may have felt that we were not welcome at NA meetings until we were clean. But NA members reassured us that this was not the case and we were encouraged to "keep coming back." We were told that through listening to the experience, strength, and hope of other recovering addicts that we too could find freedom from active addiction if we did what they did. Many of our members, however, have expressed concern about individuals on drug replacement programs. Questions come up regarding such individuals' membership status, ability to share at meetings, lead meetings, or become trusted servants on any level. "Are these members clean?" they ask. "Can one really be a 'member' and still be using?" Perhaps by answering the most important question first—the issue of membership—we can establish a context by which to approach this issue. Tradition Three says that the only requirement for NA membership is a desire to stop using. There are no exceptions to this. Desire itself establishes membership; nothing else matters, not even abstinence. It is up to the individual, no one else, to determine membership. Therefore, someone who is using and who has a desire to stop using, can be a member of NA. Members on drug replacement
programs such as methadone are encouraged to attend NA meetings. But, this
raises the question: "Does NA have the right to limit members participation
in meetings?" We believe so. While some groups choose to allow such members
to share, it is also a common practice for NA groups to encourage these
members (or any other addict who is still using), to participate only by
listening and by talking with members after the meeting or during the break.
This is not meant to alienate or embarrass; this is meant only to preserve
an atmosphere of recovery in our meetings.
It may be argued that a group's autonomy, as described in our Fourth Tradition, allows them to decide who may share at their meetings. However, while this is true, we believe that group autonomy does not justify allowing someone who is using to lead a meeting, be a speaker, or serve as a trusted servant. Group autonomy stands only until it affects other groups or NA as a whole. We believe it affects other groups and NA as a whole when we allow members who are not clean to be a speaker, chair a meeting, or be a trusted servant for NA. Many groups have developed
guidelines to ensure that an atmosphere of recovery is
Our fellowship must be mindful of what kind of message we are carrying if a still-using addict leads a meeting, or becomes a trusted servant. We believe that under these circumstances we would not be carrying the Narcotics Anonymous message of recovery. Permissiveness in this area is not consistent with our traditions. We believe our position on this issue reinforces our recovery, protects our meetings, and supports addicts in striving for total abstinence. Note: This bulletin addresses
the use of methadone maintenance as a drug replacement strategy. It is
not addressing the medicinal use of methadone as a pain killer. We encourage
those who have concerns about the use of methadone in pain management to
refer to Narcotics Anonymous pamphlet, In Times of Illness.
|
|
|
|