|
|
|
![]() |
#31
meeting attendance cards This paper, written in 2002, is meant to serve as a response to the numerous inquiries we have received from groups regarding meeting attendance cards. The meeting attendance card phenomenon is multinational in scope. We are aware of it occurring in parts of North and South America, as well as in Asia, the Pacific Rim, and Europe. Please note, however, that we are working from our North American experience, and your own national or local situation might greatly affect the appropriateness of this bulletin. The group is the final authority in this matter. The suggestions offered here are merely intended to aid groups in their decision-making processes. INTRODUCTION Many of these attendance cards came about as tools developed by drug courts to verify the mandatory attendance component of their sentences. Our initial interactions with drug courts began in the United States in 1998. There were approximately 100 drug courts in operation in the US at that time. It is projected that there could be 1500 drug courts in the US alone by 2004! Similar
programs have begun to spring up in other countries as well. The strategies
presented in this resource paper will help equip groups and members
to welcome the additional newcomers without being overburdened. One of
the principal concerns expressed over and over again is whether signing
a meeting attendance card conflicts with the guidance expressed in Traditions
Six and Ten. We don't believe that it does in principle-though we encourage
each group to discuss this question for themselves, just as we have
done. The rationale for our thinking is: If a group were to report on
members' attendance, their behavior, whether they stay for the whole
meeting, their participation or lack thereof, or report somehow on the
nature of their recovery, we might say that the line between cooperation
and affiliation had been crossed. But when, at the request of people
attending our meeting, we simply provide verification of their attendance
without any consideration of why they are requesting that verification,
we believe that is a reasonable approach that doesn't endorse or affiliate
with the requesting agency. We must
remember that our intent here is solely to carry the message; it is
not to serve as an agent of, or assistant to, an outside organization.
Addicts arrive at the doors of Narcotics Anonymous for a variety of
reasons, many times relating to external pressures. Ultimately, their
desire to stay in NA will depend on whether or not they have a desire
to stop using drugs. Our purpose--to carry the message of recovery from
drug addiction-remains the same regardless of the reason(s) a person
may come to our meetings. Clearly,
the Fourth Tradition leaves the final decision to each group as to whether
or not to accommodate meeting attendance cards. We would ask that in
making your decision you include in your considerations whether it is
our place to judge the desire of anyone to stop using. Our literature,
in discussing Step Twelve, states, "It is absolutely none of our
business to decide who is ready to hear the message of recovery and
who is not. Many of us have formed such a judgment about an addict's
desire for recovery and have been mistaken." (It Works: How
and Why, Narcotics Anonymous World Services, Inc. 1993, p.120) How
many of our members first came to NA not sure whether they were really
addicts or whether they were just here to please
someone else? Some groups
have expressed a frustration and a feeling of being challenged by an
influx of people with meeting attendance cards coming to their meetings.
Some have gone so far as to tell individuals with these cards that they
are not welcome at that group. While we understand the frustration these
groups might feel, we would encourage you to avoid such behavior. Sometimes
when a group in a small or rural NA area is feeling overwhelmed by attendance
cards, they seek help from their area service committee. A discussion
is held at area to determine which groups are best able to accommodate
a large influx of newcomers and which groups might be unable to maintain
their atmosphere of recovery under this circumstance. An area meeting
list is prepared for agencies that send individuals to meetings with
attendance cards to be verified, showing which groups will sign the
cards and which will not. Cooperation among the groups within an area,
and between the area and referral agencies, enables each individual
group to conduct its recovery meeting with a minimum of disruption to
the essential atmosphere of recovery. Two primary
goals of a Narcotics Anonymous group are to help its members stay clean
and to carry the NA message to the addict who still suffers. If we don't
make individuals feel welcome at their initial exposure to Narcotics
Anonymous, why would they come back? In addition, accommodating this
protocol strongly enriches our public relations and fosters goodwill
toward Narcotics Anonymous. One or
more of the following suggestions might help a group to be successful
in their accommodation of meeting attendance cards.
Potential
NA members come to their first meetings from many referral sources.
If your group resources are being challenged by a large contingent of
addicts attending from a facility of some type, consider contacting
your area service committee for help. Your area public information subcommittee
might be able to contact the referral source director and explain the
dilemma, depending on your local situation. If other NA meetings are
available, it is possible that the facility might send some of their
residents to one meeting and some to another so as not to overwhelm
the group's ability to welcome the attendees at either location. Another
strategy to consider when a group's resources are at risk of being depleted
is to inquire as to the possibility of renting a space for a new meeting
at the drug court facility. This enables some members from the community
to support this meeting without the meeting overwhelming another group's
atmosphere of recovery, ability to provide sponsorship, or ability to
remain self-supporting when faced with the sheer numbers of newcomers
appearing at one time. Many areas
are discovering that a service committee presentation to their local
drug court stating what we can do, as well as what we can't do, is helpful.
This will go a long way toward eliminating, or at least reducing, the
confusion that can result from the interaction between Narcotics Anonymous
and the judiciary. Whereas we certainly don't endorse or align with
the judicial approach to drug addiction, there are many in the legal
and correctional fields who do believe in Narcotics Anonymous. We cooperate
with the professional community by providing information about what
Narcotics Anonymous is and what we offer. "NA as a whole has no opinion on drug courts, but drug courts are free to have an opinion about NA. There's nothing in the traditions that prohibits us from cultivating good relationships with local drug courts. We can do this by cooperating with them: Welcoming the newcomers they send us and signing or stamping their court cards, having our PI committee members meet with drug court professionals, and providing those professionals with material that explains our program to the non-member." (The above paragraph has been excerpted from the NAWS, Inc., Annual Report, 1 January-30 June 1999, p. 13.) CONCLUSION |
|
|
|
|
|